The
Buck Act of 1940
Buck
Act – The Jurisdiction Of The Land
Sep
201231 C.F.R. 52.2, 31 C.F.R. Parts 51.2, American Banana Co. v.
United Fruit Co., Buck Act, Delaware Corporation for Profit, federal
area, Howard v. Sinking Fund of Louisville, New York Cent. v.
Chisholm, Public Salary Tax Act of 1939, social Security, Social
Security For-Profit General Delaware Corporation, Sovereign document,
Title 12, United States v. Spelar, Wheeling Steel Corp v. Fox
(For
Frank ‘Austin’ England III)
(Blog
Masters Note: Obviously, this is one of ‘Austin’s’ teaching
tools, but the opening statement, before the document is probably
‘Austin’. )
The
United States Code (I believe in Title 12-Describing Jurisdiction
states that Federal jurisdiction ends at the State Borders (3 miles
offshore) and is over Federal Lands within the State Boundaries. We
living outside D.C., Somoa, U.S. Virgin Islands, Mariannas Islands,
are not within Federal Jurisdiction.
THE
STORY OF THE BUCK ACT
by
Richard
McDonald
edited
by Mitch Modeleski
In
order for you to understand the full import of what is happening, I
must explain certain laws to you.
When
passing new statutes, the Federal government always does everything
according to the principles of law. In order for the Federal
Government to tax a Citizen of one of the several states, they had to
create some sort of contractual nexus. This contractual nexus is the
“Social Security Number”.
In
1935, the federal government instituted Social Security. The Social
Security Board then created 10 Social Security “Districts”. The
combination of these “Districts” resulted in a “Federal area”
which covered all the several states like a clear plastic overlay.
In
1939, the federal government instituted the “Public Salary Tax Act
of 1939”. This Act is a municipal law of the District of Columbia
for taxing all federal and state government employees and those who
live and work in any “Federal area”. Now, the government knows it
cannot tax those state Citizens who live and work outside the
territorial jurisdiction of Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 (1:8:17)
or Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2 (4:3:2) in the U.S. Constitution.
So, in 1940, Congress passed the “Buck Act”, 4 U.S.C.S.
Sections 105-113. In Section 110(e), this Act authorized any
department of the federal government to create a “Federal area”
for imposition of the “Public Salary Tax Act of 1939”. This tax
is imposed at 4 U.S.C.S. Sec. 111. The rest of the taxing law is
found in the Internal Revenue Code. The Social Security Board had
already created a “Federal area” overlay.
4
U.S.C.S. Sec. 110(d).
The term “State” includes any Territory or possession of the
United States. ( Note: the use of the capital “S” in “State”
is reference to the designated territorial “States” and
possessions held by the Corporate “United States”.)
4
U.S.C.S. Sec. 110(e).
The term “Federal area” means any lands or premises held or
acquired by or for the use of the United States or any department,
establishment, or agency of the United States; and any Federal area,
or any part thereof, which is located within the exterior
boundaries
of
any State, shall be deemed to be a Federal area located within such
State. There is no reasonable doubt that the federal “State” is
imposing an excise tax under the provisions of 4 U.S.C.S. Section
105, which states in pertinent part:
Sec.
105. State, and so forth, taxation affecting Federal areas; sales or
use tax (a) No “person” (NOTE: the term person references a
fictional entity) shall be relieved from liability for payment of,
collection of, or accounting for any sales or use tax levied by any
State, or by any duly constituted taxing authority therein, having
jurisdiction to levy such tax, on the ground that the sale or use,
with respect to which such tax is levied, occurred in whole or in
part within a Federal area; and such State or taxing authority shall
have full jurisdiction and power to levy and collect any such tax in
any Federal area within such State to the same extent and with the
same effect as though such area was not a Federal area.
Irrespective
of what the tax is called, if its purpose is to produce revenue, it
is an income tax or a receipts tax under the Buck Act[4 U.S.C.A.
Secs. 105-110]. Humble Oil Refining Co. v. Calvert, 464 SW 2d. 170
(1971), affd (Tex) 478 SW 2d. 926, cert. den. 409 U.S. 967, 34 L.Ed.
2d. 234, 93 S.Ct. 293.
Thus,
the obvious question arises: What is a “Federal area”?
A
“Federal area” is any area designated by any agency, department,
or establishment of the federal government. This includes the
Social Security areas designated by the Social Security
Administration, any public housing area that has federal funding, a
home that has a federal bank loan, a road that has federal funding,
and almost everything that the federal government touches through any
type of aid. Springfield v. Kenny, 104 N.E. 2d 65 (1951 App.).
This “Federal area” attaches to anyone who has a Social
Security Number or any personal contact with the federal or state
governments.
Through
this mechanism, the federal government usurped the Sovereignty of the
People, as well as the Sovereignty of the several states, by creating
“Federal areas” within the boundaries of the states under the
authority of Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2 (4:3:2) in the federal
Constitution, which states:
2.
The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful
Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property
belonging to the United States, and nothing in this Constitution
shall be so construed as to prejudice any claims of the United
States, or of any particular State.
Therefore,
all U.S. citizens [i.e. franchised citizens of the District of
Columbia] residing in one of the states of the Union, are classified
as property, as franchisee’s of the federal government, and as an
“individual entity”. See Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox,
298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct. 773. Under the “Buck
Act”, 4 U.S.C.S. Secs. 105-113, the federal government has created
a “Federal area” within the boundaries of all the several states.
This
area is similar to any territory that the federal government acquires
through purchase, conquest or treaty, thereby imposing federal
territorial law upon all people in this “Federal area”. Federal
territorial law is evidenced by the Executive Branch’s
yellow-fringed U.S. flag flying in schools, offices and all
courtrooms designating a mercantile jurisdiction.
You
must live on the land in one of the states in the Union of several
states, not in any “Federal State” or “Federal area”, nor can
you be involved in any activity that would make you subject to
“federal laws”. You cannot have a valid Social Security Number, a
“resident” driver’s license, a motor vehicle registered in your
name, a “federal” bank account, a Federal Register Account Number
relating to Individual persons [SSN], (see Executive Order Number
9397, November 1943), or any other known “contract implied in fact”
that would place you within any “Federal area” and thus within
the territorial jurisdiction of the municipal laws of Congress.
Remember, all acts of Congress are territorial in nature and only
apply within the territorial jurisdiction of Congress. (See American
Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co.,
213 U.S. 347, 356-357 (1909); United States v. Spelar,
338 U.S. 217, 222, 94 L.Ed. 3, 70 S.Ct. 10 (1949); New York
Cent. R. Co. v. Chisholm, 268
U.S. 29, 31-32, 69 L.Ed. 828, 45 S.Ct. 402 (1925).)
There
has been created a fictional Federal “State within a state”. See
Howard v. Sinking Fund of Louisville,
344 U.S. 624, 73 S.Ct. 465, 476, 97 L.Ed. 617 (1953); Schwartz
v. O’Hara TP.
School
Dist., 100 A. 2d. 621, 625, 375 Pa. 440. (Compare also 31 C.F.R.
Parts 51.2 and 52.2, which also identify a fictional State within a
state.) This fictional “State” is identified by the use of
two-letter abbreviations like “CA”, “AZ” and “TX”, as
distinguished from the authorized abbreviations like “Calif.”,
“Ariz.” and “Tex.”, etc. This fictional State also uses ZIP
codes which are within the municipal, exclusive legislative
jurisdiction of Congress.
This
entire scheme was accomplished by passage of the “Buck Act”, 4
U.S.C.S. Secs. 105-113, to implement the application of the “Public
Salary Tax Act of 1939” to workers within the private sector. This
subjects all private sector workers who have a Social Security number
to all state and federal laws “within this State”, a “fictional
Federal area” overlaying the land in California and in all other
states in the Union. In California, this is established by California
Form 590, Revenue and Taxation.
All
you have to do is to state that you live in California. This
establishes that you do not live in a “Federal area” and that you
are exempt from the Public Salary Tax Act of 1939 and also from the
California Income Tax for residents who live “in this State”.
The
following definition is used throughout the several states in the
application of their municipal laws which require some sort of
contract for proper application. This definition is also included in
all the codes of California, Nevada, Arizona, Utah and New York:
“In
this State” or “in the State” means within the exterior limits
of the State … and includes all territories within such limits
owned or ceded to the United States of America.
This
definition concurs with the “Buck Act”
supra which states: 110(d) The term “State” includes any
Territory or possession of the United States.
110(e)
The term “Federal area” means any lands or premises held or
acquired by or for the use of the United States or any department,
establishment, or agency of the United States; and any Federal area,
or any part thereof, which is located within the exterior boundaries
of any State, shall be deemed to be a Federal area located within
such State.
So,
do some research. I have given you all the proper directions in which
to look for the jurisdictional nexus that places you within the
purview of the federal government. NOTE: The Social Security number
does not attach to the “Natural Man”, but is assigned to the
fictitious entity entitled as “Person”. The man on the land does
not have or is he in his “Natural” standing, assigned a social
security, the “Natural Man” is however, the beneficiary of the
individual constructive trust that the individual social security
number references.
SOCIAL
SECURITY CORP, DEPART. OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE [is defined
as] a For-Profit General Delaware Corporation Incorporation date:
11/13/89 File No. 2213135 . . . and would suggest a quid pro quo
consideration, establishing no controlling jurisdictional nexus over
the beneficiary while providing the required benefit.
US
CODE TITLE 4 CHAPTER 4 § 110
§
110. Same; definitions
As
used in sections 105–109 of this title—
(a)
The term “person” shall have the meaning assigned to it in
section 3797 of title 26.
(b)
The term “sales or use tax” means any tax levied on, with respect
to, or measured by, sales, receipts from sales, purchases, storage,
or use of tangible personal property, except a tax with respect to
which the provisions of section 104 of this title are applicable.
(c)
The term “income tax” means any tax levied on, with respect to,
or measured by, net income, gross income, or gross receipts.
(d)
The term “State” includes any Territory or possession of the
United States.
(e)
The term “Federal area” means any lands or premises held or
acquired by or for the use of the United States or any department,
establishment, or agency, of the United States; and any Federal area,
or any part thereof, which is located within the exterior boundaries
of any State, shall be deemed to be a Federal area located within
such State.
